A salute to Steve Morrow
I have to say that since the end of last season, I’ve agreed with far more of Steve Morrow’s decisions than I’ve disagreed with. It is difficult, from the outside, to know who made what decision or whose connections caused what move. But, I get the feeling that since Oscar Pareja left, most of those decisions fall on Morrow and Michael Hitchcock’s shoulders.
I posted on the FC Dallas Blog that hopefully this was a decision made that combined Morrow’s UK job prospects with whatever discontent might have existed. Having said that, I’m going to proceed under the assumption that this decision was entirely out of Morrow’s hands and analyze the major decisions of this season.
- The trade of Carlos Ruiz to the Galaxy for allocation money that eventually led to Davino seems to have panned out completely. Even just having Ruiz off the roster seemed like a good move in a salary cap situation. In the NBA, we would have gotten nothing, as trades need to be approximately equal value so we just would not have picked up Ruiz’s option. Duilio has been a wonderful addition. This was probably a Morrow/Hitchcock consensus.
- Moving from a 4-4-2 to a 3-5-2 seemed almost obvious to me given our personnel and how many other MLS teams have used a similar formation successfully.
- Loaning Ray Burse to Portland seemed borderline brilliant. I’m sure a lot of people would have liked to have seen Burse come in during the 2nd half, but I wouldn’t have made that decision.
- Playing Dario Sala over Ray Burse? Questionable but understandable pre-season, obvious after Sala’s first 3-4 games
- Letting Clarence Goodson be taken in the expansion draft proved wise.
- Lackluster start for Juan Toja, Arturo Alvarez, and most of our midfield has been the most unnerving part of this entire season to me and where Morrow deserves most of the blame. My question is this: which of Morrow’s superiors is qualified enough to judge this? Hitchcock is a salesman. HSG put this team in Frisco. And isn’t this the kind of thing you judge after the season as opposed to 1/3 of the way through it?
- Not bringing in a top-notch striker, as was rumored, seems completely out of Morrow’s hands. Given the way many Latin American playmakers and strikers play (this is where all the rumors came from), I don’t think there’s a chance that could have had an effect on that blowout.
Again, this all assumes this was a one-sided decision. Reading through the comments for the above FCD Blog post and the LA reaction, I seem to be in the minority, so did I miss anything?
[Edit: Buzz agrees with me]

11 Responses to “A salute to Steve Morrow”
By stevetoro on May 20, 2008
*sniff*
By Nathan on May 20, 2008
Holy crap! Agree completely with your assessment..
I have to assume that something occurred post match to bring this about so quickly. I thought Steve made a lot of good decisions in terms of the talent he traded and brought in to PHP. The formation transition this year was also a good move, although I think as a team we are still not exploiting it properly.
If I were to fault Steve, I would say that he did not manage to instill enough discipline and work ethic in this team. Sunday’s game was a prime example, but that wasn’t the first time by any means.
At times I think he has been tactically out thought also. Sunday’s game was again an example of that.
Steve’s final comments were that he would take full responsibility for Sunday’s loss, and he has done that.
Hopefully Steve will bounce back and resurface and go on to better things.. but don’t go to Walsall - you’re better than that!
By KirkBhoy on May 20, 2008
I believe Steve’s mistakes are on par with a first-time manager. I would have liked to have seen a veteran assistant be brought in, as having a guy like Oscar Pareja around is invaluable. I would be shocked if he wasn’t at least asked if he was interested in the opening.
By KirkBhoy on May 20, 2008
Anyone ever had a comment removed from the FCD blog? Don’t know why mine was…
By Nathan on May 20, 2008
Obviously the streamer dude is policing the blog now.
By stevetoro on May 20, 2008
prolly for language. that’s why i’ve seen others removed. that and for starting crazy rumors. although no one’s removed all the posts calling for mourinho or bruce arena to be named the next coach.
By KirkBhoy on May 20, 2008
There was no bad language in it. The most offensive thing I did was remind people Hitchcock is in the last year of his contract.
And I wished Morrow well, several times…
Comment deleted
This post has been removed by the author.
May 20, 2008 11:48 AM
Clearly I did not remove it. Considering how many people are calling out players and other fans as stupid, makes you wonder…
By Nathan on May 20, 2008
re-post it and see what happens.
By Nathan on May 20, 2008
I see another post was deleted. Was that your comment deleted again? It sounds like it has upset more than a few people now. I don’t understand it, the prawn comment with the logo of a guy flipping people off is pretty close to the edge.. but it remains up. Strange things are afoot at the CircleK
By KirkBhoy on May 20, 2008
Actually, now that I think about it I called Bill Parcells an asshole (it made sense in context). I guess I don’t really consider that word to be so bad (I grew up watching MTV, after all).
My bad.
By Nathan on May 20, 2008
Yeah.. that probably did it.